Article Info | Á¦27±Ç 2È£ °¿ø ³ó¾÷»ý¸íȯ°æ¿¬±¸ Vol.27, No.2, pp.38-46, 2015 |
Title | ³ó»ê¹° Àü°úÁ¤ ź¼Ò¹èÃâ·® »êÁ¤ ¹× ½Ã³ª¸®¿À ºÐ¼® |
Author | ÀÌÁøÈ« , À̺´¿À |
Institutions | |
Abstract |
The purpose of this study is making suggestions for carbon labelling policy by certification & indication system, which is controlling the data quality. For this purpose, this study performed (1) quantitatively evaluating carbon emissions of the entire process, from production to distribution, (2) comparatively analyzing a calculation method. The data for this study is based on paddy rice, greenhouse lettuce grown in the field, linked to LCI database, which is carbon emission units on fertilizers, pesticides, energy, subsidiary materials, etc. in the RDA, the Ministry of Environment, Ecoinvent DB. The research results are as follows; 1) It was found that amounts of the CO emission were 0.9 CO -eq./kg in paddy rice, 1.1CO -eq./kg in greenhouse lettuce using the Life Cycle Assessment(LCA), linked to an inventory of 99 items. 2) When creating a scenario of the greenhouse gas emissions by considering factors influencing on agricultural production, some of which is methane emissions in paddy rice, agricultural electricity and oil in agricultural machinery and protect agriculture, utilization of livestock manure fertilizer and chemical fertilizers, it was found that amounts of the CO emission were decreased by 29.5-38.2% in rice, 8.2-9.1% in greenhouse lettuce. As far as reduction effects is concerned, it is said that it is directly related to irrigation in rice fields and utilization of fertilizer, and fuel consumption. To this end, the policy goals of carbon footprint labelling should be set as PCR in LCA and greenhouse gas (methane) emissions in IPCC guidelines (2006) |
Keyword | Carbon footprint labelling, Certification & Indication system, LCA. |
7-À̺´¿À7.24 ÃÖÁ¾¼öÁ¤.pdf |